Session: Race
Lap AND MPR timecode of incident: 18 (leader 19) / 20:50
Car(s) involved: PitlaneRacer
Location of incident: Pit lane entry
Brief description of incident: Entering the pit lane after the red flag is issued and taking service before exiting the pit lane, breaking NDR Sporting Code XIII.3.3.b
Session: Race
Lap AND MPR timecode of incident: 18 (leader 19) / 21:10
Car(s) involved: PitlaneRacer / [WCL] T.Soini / [LCS-R] MaTe
Location of incident: Pit lane
Brief description of incident: PitlaneRacer is gaining position on Soini and Mate under the red flag condition.
Well, racing games in general are probably the most repetetive gaming genre out there. Going in circles over and over again, for tens or even hundreds of the same laps. Then go in different circles maybe with different car, but the idea stays the same. But unlike some story-based RPG games, the replayability is huge.
There's pretty much no joy in playing some Assassin's Creed title for the third time, you already know the story and the environment is already explored, so there's not much meaningful to do. Meanwhile in the racing sim you can jump in and try to beat your old PB or other racers who are just driving around. Even 2 races at same combo will turn out completely differently.
Racing sims naturally don't have any specific goal or other natural limit and you are free to do what you want to do, that's where the long replayability comes from. Guys who you speak to at this forum have circled the world multiple times while still being entertained and motivated to keep driving.
Involved driver here - I take full responsibility for this collision, lost concentration after the mayhem in first two turns and became unaware of the car on the inside. Completely my fault.
Since we havent seen anything from Fern Bay, Id say there is at least extra 6 months before the update gets released.
Maybe a Christmas present? (just giving ideas)
Cannot wait!
Go to LFS/data/raf - that is where the saved file will be stored. To read the .raf file you need external tool, please go to https://www.lfs.net/replay-analysers to obtain one
Session AND SERVER of Incident: Race
Lap AND MPR timecode of incident: L1 / 3:00
Car(s) involved: 10, 47
Location of Incident: back straight
Brief Description of Incident: car no. 10 drives in the middle of the back straight, I (car no. 47) attempt to pass on the right side, car 10 then keeps squeezing me to the edge of the track until collision occurs and lag sends me into the wall.
My car was already 2/3 beyond the white edge line at the moment of contact...
Of course I know which setting it is in and I never did set it to 1024, in fact I was even avoiding it all the time to avoid being charged for feature I don't intend to use. That's why I'm so suprised I got charged for it when I certainly didn't activate it.
To the edit question:
I won 3 GBP voucher some time ago in an event, planned to use these for extra skin slots, but definitely not for hi-res skin download. That's why I had a positive balance.
so during the last night I received an email from LFS Tech, stating that I have been charged for ability to download skins in high resolution.
The thing is, I never enabled this function in LFS in first place. And certainly not during last days. So it was quite a surprise for me to receive this message.
Now I am not asking for refund or anything (let that 1 GBP be an unscheduled support to LFS devs), but I would like to find out, how or why did this actually happen. Can anyone help? @Scawen?
The text of the email is following:
Dear michal 1279,
This email is sent to notify you that 2000 high resolution skin downloads have just been assigned to your LFS account, because you have used the high resolution skin downloads feature of LFS.
For this, one pound has been deducted from your LFS account balance. Your remaining balance is now 2.00 GBP.
For a complete overview of all your LFS payments and expenses, you can visit your account status page at http://www.lfs.net/?page=viewstatus
But would you please consider adding the New York E-Prix circuit replica?
I know it is little narrow (but honestly your mini-Monaco feels even narrower ) but with UF1 or XFG it would be absolutely doable